HiRail Leasing, based in Ontario, Canada, specializes in converting standard truck chassis, from Ford F350s to Freightliner 10-wheelers, into rail-ready maintenance vehicles for Canadian National (CN). ONMOTIO stepped in to elevate their design workflows, ensuring compliance with PDM best practices, regulatory standards, and industry expectations, while playing a hands-on role in mechanical integration, weight & balance analysis, and manufacturing support.
HiRail Leasing converts standard truck chassis, from a Ford F350 up to a Freightliner ten-wheeler, into maintenance vehicles that run on both road and rail for Canadian National.
The product is not a vehicle. It is a configuration system that has to produce a compliant vehicle from any chassis in the catalogue.
[ HOW IT WORKS ]
A stock chassis, made compliant.
Every conversion starts from a different truck and has to end at the same standard. Without a configuration system that is a bespoke engineering job each time, which is exactly the trap HiRail was in.
Mode Road
All
01
02
03
04
01/ 05Swipe
The whole truck
Road to rail, rear gear first
Tap 01 to 04, or swipe the drawing, to look closer at each part.
01 . Front rail gear
Behind the cab, straight down
Lowered second. It lifts the front tires clear of the rail.
02 . Rear rail gear
Behind the last axle
Lowered first. The rear tires stay on the rail and drive.
03 . Loader
At the rear, folded over the deck
Stowed while the truck travels.
04 . Outriggers
Folded up beside the loader
They take the load when the loader works.
01 . Front rail gear
Behind the cab, straight down
Lowered second. It lifts the front tires clear of the rail.
02 . Rear rail gear
Behind the last axle
Lowered first. The rear tires stay on the rail and drive.
03 . Loader
At the rear, folded over the deck
Stowed while the truck travels.
04 . Outriggers
Folded up beside the loader
They take the load when the loader works.
[ INSIDE ]
Standardise once, configure many.
The engineering value here is not in any single vehicle. It is in the drawings, the part numbering and the process that let a small team produce the twentieth conversion as reliably as the first.
Swipe along the sheet, cab to loader →
System
Structured PDM implementation
Standardised configuration drawings
Part numbering and revision control
Manufacturing process definition
Team training
Vehicle
Onboard crane integration
Stabiliser mounting and load paths
Rail signalling equipment
Hydraulic and electrical routing
Weight and balance per platform
[ WHAT ONMOTIO DID ]
From bespoke jobs to a repeatable process.
HiRail were building good vehicles and re-solving the same problems every time. Each conversion carried its own drawings, its own decisions and its own risk of falling short of the CN documentation standard.
We put a PDM system underneath the work, standardised the configuration drawings, drove the hydraulic and electrical integration, and ran weight and balance across the chassis platforms so rail safety could be demonstrated rather than argued.
Design standardisation
2018
One configuration drawing set for every truck: six sheets, from the isometric view to the side, end and plan views and the overall dimensions.
PDM setup
2018
A document system with one numbering scheme for every part and drawing, and a release workflow: work in progress, review, ready, released or rejected.
Custom configuration
2018
Each truck assembled as a 3D mock-up from the chassis, deck, loader, outrigger and rail gear models. Here, the tridem log loader on rail.
Hydraulic integration
2018
Every hydraulic line routed in the 3D mock-up: tank, cooler, filter, a three-lever control valve bank and the lines out to each function.
Electrical integration
2018
The wiring diagram from the fuse panel to every device the conversion adds: wig-wag and driving lights, loader controls, proximity switches, PTO and airbag solenoids.
Process and training
2018
An assembly sequence, an assembly manual and inspection plans, then a day of training so HiRail's own team runs the system. Here, a finished truck.
01/ 06Swipe
01
02
03
04
05
06
2018
Design standardisation
We started from the chassis, loader, deck and rail gear models and drawings supplied by HiRail and its suppliers, checked one by one before use. From them we fixed one drawing format with its title block and one set of six sheets per truck: isometric view, both sides, front and rear, overall dimensions with the loaded and empty center of gravity, and the plan. Every later truck was drawn on that same set.
2018
PDM setup
With the drawing set fixed, every file needed a single place and a single number. We set up a document management system with one numbering scheme, from the truck down to each part and drawing, document categories from configuration drawings to assembly manuals and conformity reports, and a release workflow: work in progress, in review, ready to release, then released or rejected. Each configuration that followed was filed and released through it.
2018
Custom configuration
Each truck configuration then got its own folder and drawing set. The chassis, deck, loader, outriggers, tool boxes, lights and both rail gear units were assembled in a 3D mock-up from their makers' models and drawings. Four log loader configurations came out of it, tandem and tridem. Each went out with its weight distribution analysis, so its weight and balance were known before the truck was built.
2018
Hydraulic integration
The loader, its outriggers and both rail gear units all run on hydraulics, so the circuit was drawn in the mock-up with everything else. We routed every line in 3D, from the tank through the cooler and filter to the three-lever control valve bank and out to each function, with the hose reel and the loader pedestal in place. The routing and the hydraulic schematic joined each truck's drawing set.
2018
Electrical integration
A rail truck carries more electrics than its chassis came with: wig-wag and driving lights, loader lights, proximity switches, PTO and airbag solenoids, the loader's slip ring and remote drive. We drew one wiring diagram from the fuse panel, each run labeled with its number of wires and each device numbered, through two rear junction boxes. It joined the drawing set beside the hydraulic routing.
2018
Process and training
The last step turned the drawings into a way of building. We wrote the assembly sequence, the assembly manual and the inspection plans that check each truck against its drawing set, and filed them in the document system. A day of training then handed the system to HiRail's team, so their own people could run it.
We put a PDM system underneath the work, standardised the configuration drawings, drove the hydraulic and electrical integration, and ran weight and balance across the chassis platforms so rail safety could be demonstrated rather than argued.
Three calls that shaped it
Method
A configuration system covering every platform
instead ofEngineering each conversion on its own merits
It front-loads a large amount of work before a single extra vehicle ships, and it constrains what a salesperson can promise. What it buys is a twentieth conversion as good as the first.
Compliance
Weight and balance validated per chassis platform
instead ofValidating each finished vehicle individually
Rail safety is a documentation problem as much as a physical one. Working per platform means the answer exists before the vehicle does.
Handover
Training the team to run the system
instead ofKeeping the knowledge with the consultant
It ends our involvement sooner. It is also the only version where the improvement survives the project.
Method
A configuration system covering every platform
instead ofEngineering each conversion on its own merits
It front-loads a large amount of work before a single extra vehicle ships, and it constrains what a salesperson can promise. What it buys is a twentieth conversion as good as the first.
Compliance
Weight and balance validated per chassis platform
instead ofValidating each finished vehicle individually
Rail safety is a documentation problem as much as a physical one. Working per platform means the answer exists before the vehicle does.
Handover
Training the team to run the system
instead ofKeeping the knowledge with the consultant
It ends our involvement sooner. It is also the only version where the improvement survives the project.
[ THE WORK ]
Concepts, sections and launch visuals.
[ WHERE IT WENT ]
The process outlived the project.
Compliance with CN documentation standards was achieved, weight and balance calculations were validated for rail safety, and the manufacturing process and team training were delivered so the capability stayed inside the company.
CN standards
documentation compliance achieved
Every platform
weight and balance validated
In-house
process and training handed over
[ THE SAME TEAM ]
Bring us a problem at this stage.
This project needed several disciplines that usually sit at several different suppliers. Doing them under one roof is what stops a good concept from arriving at a factory that cannot quote it.